ICH Q2/ICH Q14 Analytical Procedure Life Cycle Management - Im Auftrag der ECA Academy

16/17 September 2020, Berlin, Germany

Seminar-Nr. 17634


Chris Burgess, Burgess Analytical Consultancy Limited
Joachim Ermer,  Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Gerald Gellermann, Novartis
Annick Gervais, UCB Pharma
Rainer Gnibl, Local Government of Upper Bavaria
Patrick Jackson, GSK
Luka Kosec,  Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of the Republic of Slovenia
Jürgen Martin, Martin-Consulting
Xaver Schratt, GBA Pharma
Mijo Stanic, Chromicent


This conference provides a comprehensive overview of the new ICH Quality GuidelineQ14, on Analytical Procedure Development, and the revised Q2 Guideline on Validation of Analytical Procedures. Experts from authorities, industry and contract laboratories will discuss with you the contents, their significance for practice and approaches for implementation in your company.


As early as 2018, the ICH announced that the Q2(R2)/Q14 Expert Working Group (EWG) would develop a new ICH quality guideline, ICH Q14, for the development of analytical methods and revise the ICH Q2(R1) guideline for the validation of analytical procedures. This will complement the existing ICH Q8 to Q12 guidance and the current ICH Q13 guidance for continuous manufacturing. The new Analytical Procedure Development Guideline (Q14) will then be relevant for sections S4, P4 and P5 of the CTD and should be seen together with Q8(R2) and Q11 as a supplement to the guidelines. The use of the enhanced approach to analytical procedures development and validation can contribute to resource-efficient drug development as well as submission process or facilitate changes after CMC approval. The revised Q2(R1) guideline will also be relevant for sections S4, P4 and P5 of the CTD, with an emphasis on systematic analytical development. As development and validation are linked and subsequent steps, both guidelines will be worked on by the same Expert Working Group, with a potential to combine both documents into one.

Q2(R1) Revision
The current Q2(R1) „Guideline on Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology“ does not yet include modern analytical methods (e.g. near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy or Raman spectroscopy). This gap can lead to insufficient validation data for submissions and thus to additional official queries and thus to a delay in the approval of the application. This applies in particular to methods based on multivariate models, a category for which there is currently no guidance in ICH Q2(R1). NIR or Raman spectroscopy is often used in process control and real-time release testing (RTRT) using multivariate analytical methods. Therefore, the revision of ICH Q2(R1) will specifically serve the validation of modern analytical methods, including a discussion of statistical aspects. Common validation characteristics for methods such as NIR, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and hyphenated techniques such as CE-MS, CE-ICP-MS, LC-NMR, GC-MS, LC-MS will also be considered.

Q14 Analytical Method Development Guide
As there is no ICH guideline for the development of analytical methods yet, it is often the case that applicants only report on analytical validation results and seldom present a performance evaluation with analytical development results. This makes communication with the regulatory authorities more difficult, especially when unconventional analytical methods are used (e.g. RTRT and multivariate models for process control). In addition, the lack of guidelines excludes the possibility for the applicant to provide a scientific basis for flexible regulatory approaches (e.g. Quality by Design (QbD) concept) to change analytical methods after approval.
According to ICH, the new directive is proposed to harmonise the scientific approaches to analytical process development and to provide the principles for the description of the analytical process development process. The new guideline should improve communication between industry and regulators and allow for more efficient, sound scientific and risk-based authorisation and change management for post-authorisation changes to analytical methods.

Issues to be addressed
Q14 Analytical Procedure Development guideline
Main technical and scientific elements, which require harmonization, include:
  • Submission of analytical procedure development and related information in CTD format,
  • The concept and strategy of enhanced approaches for analytical procedures,
  • Performance criteria of analytical procedures,
  • In line with ICH Q8 to ICH Q12, a greater understanding of analytical procedures can create the basis for more efficient, sound science and risked-based lifecycle management (e.g., using analytical QbD (AQbD) principles), 
  • Key elements and terminology,
  • Demonstration of suitability for RTRT.
Q2(R1) Revision
For procedures reliant on multivariate methods the following will be addressed:
  • Definition of validation characteristics applicable to multivariate methods which may differ with the area of application (e.g., identification vs. quantitation, batch vs. continuous process, dosage form assay vs. blending monitoring),
  • Important method parameters (e.g., the number of latent variables) established during method development,
  • Robustness which is well understood, however does not have a quantitative measure,
  • Inclusion of post-approval verification and maintenance considerations as a part of the validation,
  • Requirements for validation data sets.


This conference is addressed to all persons from
  •  Development
  •  Quality Control
  •  Quality Assurance
  •  Regulatory departments
  •  Contract labs
  •  Authorities
who are involved in the development and validation of analytical procedures or their Evaluation.


Current Status: The Revision of ICH Q2 and Development of ICH Q14
  •  Important gaps and deficiencies in current ICH Q2(R1)
  •  Content of the draft Guidelines Q2 / Q14
  •  Small step or giant leap?
  •  Have industry’s expectations been met?
Description of Analytical Procedure and Validation - a Regulator’s View
  •  Development of analytical method vs validation of analytical method
  •  Overall control strategies
Product Life Cycle Concept from the Perspective of the Authorities - Focus: New Approaches in Process Development/Validation & Production Routine
  •  Quality by Design Lifecycle
  •  Realtime Release Testing
  •  Modern Process Analysis                             
How to establish an Analytical Target Profile (ATP) for Small Molecules
  •  What needs an ATP
  •  When to Establish ATPs
  •  How to Write ATPs
  •  How to Use/Update ATPs
How to establish an Analytical Target Profile (ATP) for Large Molecules
  •  ATP as the corner stone of the analytical procedure development strategy
  •  How to set up an ATP for methods applied to biologics
  •  Case studies
How Software Tools can Support QbD Method Development
  •  Modern Quality-by-Design approach
  •  Statistical concepts with experimental design plans (also referred to as Design-of-Experiments) as an efficient and fast tool for method development
  •  Multivariate data analysis software package Fusion QbD®
  •  Chromatography simulation software DryLab®
  •  Workflow and examples in using software packages for method development
The ECA APLM Guide
  •  The ECA Analytical Quality Control Group
  •  Interactions between the Groups within ECA
  •  Drivers for and the process of the guideline development
  •  Contents and structure of version 1 July 2018
  •  Going forward; the journey to version 2
Verifications of Compendial Methods in Pharmaceutical QC
  •  Requirements for verification of compendial methods
  •  Verification versus validation versus analytical transfer
  •  Life cycle approach for compendial methods
  •  Design ranges for compendial methods
  •  Typical verification approaches
Analytical Lifecycle Management Using an Enhanced versus Traditional Approach
  •  ATP, DOE and MODR on a case study
  •  Risk based approach and patient impact considerations
  •  Analytical method changes post approval
Robustness and DoE
  •  Experimental Design
  •  Method Optimisation – Response Surface Designs
  •  Robustness Testing – Fractional Factorial Designs
  •  Ruggedness Testing – Measurement Systems Analysis
  •  Equivalent Testing – Two One Sided Tests
Validation for MAA/NDA. Planning and Execution
  •  Overview of relevant guidelines, pharmacopeial monographs
  •  ICH Q2 current version
  •  Practical Aspects of Method Validation (incl. examples) 
TMU (Target Measurement Uncertainty)
  •  Stimuli Article by USP
  •  Deriving TMU from Specification
How to Establish an Efficient and Relevant Continued Performance Monitoring Program in Pharmaceutical Analysis
  •  What method performance information is available? (conformity, validity, numerical performance parameter)
  •  Identification of performance characteristics relevant for the analytical procedure: exploitation of available routine data
  •  Use of control charts
  •  Assay of control batches (virtual and concrete)
  •  The power of multiplicity: Calculation of long-term performance parameters (precisions)

Dieses Seminar/Webinar kann nicht gebucht werden. Alternative Termine für dieses Seminar/Webinar und ähnliche Veranstaltungen finden Sie in der Übersicht nach Thema..

Für viele Seminare und Webinare gibt es auch Aufzeichnungen, die Sie jederzeit bestellen und anschauen können. Diese Aufzeichnungen finden Sie in einer themensortierten Liste.

Oder senden Sie uns Ihre Anfrage einfach über das folgende Kontaktformular.

* auch unkompliziert per Kreditkarte bezahlbar
American Express Visa Mastercard

Weitere Termine vor Ort
Weitere Termine vor Ort nicht verfügbar
Weitere Termine online
Weitere Termine online nicht verfügbar
Aufzeichnung nicht verfügbar

Haben Sie noch Fragen?

Wir stehen Ihnen für weitere Auskünfte gerne zur Verfügung.
Tel.: +49 6221 84 44 0
E-Mail: info@concept-heidelberg.de

Frau mit Headset


Teilnehmerstimmen - das sagen andere über unsere Seminare:

"Die Umsetzung mit Memberspot ist wirklich ausgezeichnet gelungen.
Es unterstützt die Wissensvermittlung und gewährleistet auch die richtige Durchführung des Kurses.”
Christian Wagener, WAGENER & CO. GmbH
GMP Basis-Einstiegsschulung (B 1) - Aufzeichnung Online Seminar, April 2024

Guter, breit gefächerter Überblick mit interessanten Verknüpfungen zur Praxis,
welche die Theorie super veranschaulicht.”
Marina Kicoranovic, Labor Hartmann GmbH
GMP/Basis-Einstiegsschulung (B 14), September 2023

Die Referenten waren sehr gut! Sie haben sehr klar gesprochen, nur sehr wenige englische Begriffe
verwendet (super) und waren sehr praxisbezogen.”
Astrid Gießler, Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe
Live Online Seminar - Basiskurs Computervalidierung & Datenintegrität im GxP Umfeld (B 3), Juni 2023

Sehr guter Bezug zur Schulung für einen GMP-Anfänger. Habe mich sehr gut abgeholt gefühlt.”
Dr. Harald Werner, Infraserv GmbH & Co. Höchst KG
GMP-Basisschulung (B 1), Juni 2023

„Interessante Themen, gut vorgetragen, die eigenen Erfahrungen der Vortragenden helfen, dies noch besser nachzuvollziehen.“ „Gute Gestaltung der Workshops, das Zusammenarbeiten in Gruppen und der Austausch mit anderen hilft sehr.“
Manuela Seibert, Merck, GMP-Leadauditor/in (FA 2), April 2024


Bleiben Sie informiert mit dem GMP Newsletter von Concept Heidelberg!

GMP Newsletter

Concept Heidelberg bietet verschieden GMP Newsletter die Sie auf Ihren Bedarf hin zusammenstellen können.

Hier können Sie sich kostenfrei registrieren.


Kontaktieren Sie uns

Haben Sie Fragen?

Concept Heidelberg GmbH
Rischerstraße 8
69123 Heidelberg

Tel. :+49622184440
Fax : +49 6221 84 44 84
E-Mail: info@concept-heidelberg.de

zum Kontaktformular