Ph. Eur., USP and other Pharmacopoeias - Live Online Training
17/18 September 2024
Seminar-Nr. 21336
Referent:innen
Dr. Raphael Bar
BR Consulting
Dr. Ulrich Rose
Straßburg
Dr. Bernd Renger
Bernd Renger Consulting
Note: All times mentioned are CEST.
Zielsetzung
It is important to understand the structure and the procedures of the different Pharmacopoeias. Some general chapters and the monographs of some widely used excipients have already been harmonised between the most important Pharmacopoeias, USP, Ph. Eur. and JP in the context of the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG). But for a large number of general methods differences still exist. Therefore, some of the frequently asked questions are:
How to use alternative procedures and interchangeable methods?
What are the allowed exceptions to the obligation to perform all tests?
How can multi-compendial testing strategies look like?
How to prove equivalence?
In addition, PDG harmonisation does not include upcoming important pharmacopoeias like Indian and Chinese Pharmacopoeias.
This Live Online Training will discuss these issues and provides support in order to successfully deal with compendial methods and their differences.
Hintergrund
Pharmaceutical companies have to follow Pharmacopoeia standards in order to meet regulatory requirements. However, there is no single Pharmacopoeia which can be applied in all regions. The US FDA may enforce USP monographs which then become mandatory whereas compliance with Ph. Eur. is mandatory in 39 member states and the European Union (EU) and is applied in over 100 countries worldwide. Moreover, also other Pharmacopoeias exist in the world like the Japanese (included in the PDG harmonisation process) , Chinese, Russian or Indian Pharmacopoeias.
But what are the differences and how to deal with quality standards and test methods if products are manufactured and released for different markets?
Zielgruppe
This Live Online Training addresses employees and managers from Quality Control Labs. It also addresses colleagues working in Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs department.
Technical Requirements
For our Live Online Training Courses and Webinars, we use Cisco WebEx, one of the leading suppliers of online meetings. At https://www.webex.com/test-meeting.html you can check if your system meets the necessary requirements for the participation at a WebEx meeting and at the same time install the necessary plug-in. Please just enter your name and email address for the test. If the installation is not possible because of your rights for the computer system, please contact your IT department. WebEx is a standard nowadays and the necessary installation is fast and easy.
Structure, General Methods and Challenges of Ph. Eur. / Structure, Monographs and Activities of USP
Structure of Ph. Eur. and USP
Meeting Pharmacopoeial standards and Pharmacopoeial Designation
The USP approach: Single Testing
Structure of USP monographs:
modern monograph
flexible monograph
Structure of Ph. Eur. monographs
What the Pharmacopoeia does not say about a procedure
Additional Pharmacopoeias around the World – Japan, China, India, Int. Ph. (WHO), BP
Historical developments
The development of the International Pharmacopoeia
JP, ChP, Russian Ph., and IP – similarities and differences
Legal status and enforcement
WHO Good pharmacopoeial Practices
Q&A Session 1
Session 2: Important Monographs: Harmonisation, Differences, Solutions
Analytical Instrument Qualification according to Ph. Eur. and USP
USP General Chapter <1058> Analytical Instrument Qualification and Ph. Eur.
Type of instruments and risk assessment
Qualification steps: DQ, IQ, OQ and PQ
Roles and responsibilities
Revised Harmonised General Chapter on Chromatography
History and background of Ph. Eur. 2.2.46, JP <2.00>, USP <621>
Mechanisms of harmonisation between Pharmacopoeias
Definitions and adjustment of chromatographic conditions
Important changes
Pharmacopoeial Policy of Impurities Testing
Which impurities are controlled?
Analytical techniques and general texts/monographs
Control of organic impurities
What about validation?
Workshop 1: Reporting Compendial Test Results
Q&A Session 2
Programme Day 2
Session 3: Dealing with testing challenges
General Notices – Definitions and Requirements
Use of alternative procedures & interchangeable methods
Waivers to the obligation to perform all tests
Scope of general monographs
Definitions
Reference Standards - Similarities and Differences
Definitions and guidelines
Legal status of reference standards
Types of standards
Establishment and use/Testing and value assignment
Similarities and differences between pharmacopoeias
Verification / Implementation of Compendial Procedures
USP <1226> Verification of Compendial Procedures and Ph. Eur. Chapter 5.26 Implementation of Pharmacopoeial Procedures
Difference between Verification and Transfer of an analytical procedure
Chemical vs microbiological procedures
Minimal performance characteristics to be verified
What to verify in procedures for high-level (Assay by HPLC) and low-level analytes (Impurities by HPLC and TLC)
When procedure verification is not required
Documentation of procedure verification
Q&A Session 3
Alternative Methods to Pharmacopoeial Methods: Equivalence Testing of Two Methods
Is a compendial procedure equivalent to an in-house validated procedure?
Critical performance characteristics to be compared
Plotting the results of comparative testing
Traditional way of comparison of two procedures
Equivalence testing with two one-sided t-test (TOST)
Multicompendial Testing Strategies
Divergent and conflicting pharmacopoeial requirements
CDER’s MAPP 5310.7 “Acceptability of Standards from Alternative Compendia”
How to proceed in case of missing harmonization?
Full Testing, Worst Case Testing, Alternative Testing
How to proof equivalence?
Workshop 2: Meeting Challenges of Pharmacopoeial Compliance
Life Cycle Approach to Compendial Methods
USP chapter <1220> & Measurement Uncertainty
USP Chapters <1224>, <1225>, <1226>
Analytical Target Profile and Analytical Control Strategy
ICH Q2(R2) Revision
ICH Q14 Analytical Procedure Development
Q&A Session 4
Dieses Seminar/Webinar kann nicht gebucht werden. Alternative Termine für dieses Seminar/Webinar und ähnliche Veranstaltungen finden Sie in der Übersicht nach Thema..
Für viele Seminare und Webinare gibt es auch Aufzeichnungen, die Sie jederzeit bestellen und anschauen können. Diese Aufzeichnungen finden Sie in einer themensortierten Liste.
Oder senden Sie uns Ihre Anfrage einfach über das folgende Kontaktformular.
Teilnehmerstimmen - das sagen andere über unsere Seminare:
„"Die Umsetzung mit Memberspot ist wirklich ausgezeichnet gelungen. Es unterstützt die Wissensvermittlung und gewährleistet auch die richtige Durchführung des Kurses.” Christian Wagener, WAGENER & CO. GmbH GMP Basis-Einstiegsschulung (B 1) - Aufzeichnung Online Seminar, April 2024
„Danke für das tolle und interessante Seminar! Ich nehme mir fachlich total viel mit und habe viele tolle Menschen kennengelernt.“ Melanie Schifferer, DAIICHI SANKYO EUROPE GmbH Batch Record Review (QS 23) September 2024
„Guter, breit gefächerter Überblick mit interessanten Verknüpfungen zur Praxis, welche die Theorie super veranschaulicht.” Marina Kicoranovic, Labor Hartmann GmbH GMP/Basis-Einstiegsschulung (B 14), September 2023
„Die Referenten waren sehr gut! Sie haben sehr klar gesprochen, nur sehr wenige englische Begriffe verwendet (super) und waren sehr praxisbezogen.” Astrid Gießler, Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Live Online Seminar - Basiskurs Computervalidierung & Datenintegrität im GxP Umfeld (B 3), Juni 2023
„Sehr guter Bezug zur Schulung für einen GMP-Anfänger. Habe mich sehr gut abgeholt gefühlt.” Dr. Harald Werner, Infraserv GmbH & Co. Höchst KG GMP-Basisschulung (B 1), Juni 2023
„Interessante Themen, gut vorgetragen, die eigenen Erfahrungen der Vortragenden helfen, dies noch besser nachzuvollziehen.“ „Gute Gestaltung der Workshops, das Zusammenarbeiten in Gruppen und der Austausch mit anderen hilft sehr.“ Manuela Seibert, Merck, GMP-Leadauditor/in (FA 2), April 2024